:: F/A-22 internet communities :: share this site with somebody else :: got anything to tell us? :: sign or read the guestbook
:: visitors
:: home :: site entry
:: everything about the F/A 22 airframe :: F/A-22 news archive
:: F/A 22 media library :: f-22raptor.com update history
:: stealth & radar technology :: about f-22raptor.com
:: F/A 22 related web resources :: disclaimers, privacy policy etc.
:: F/A 22 stuff wannahaves
| Thursday September 9, 2010
 
Russia could start 5th generation fighter tests by yearend
Recent F-22 headlines
Holloman personnel prepare for Operation Assist Santa
F-22 Raptors return from training in Middle East
House bill passes, would delay Tyndall F-15 drawdown
Holloman on track to get
F-22 taxiway collision causes $1 million damage
F-22 exchange pilot helps strengthen U.S., Australian ties
news archive»   
After years of developments and years of speculation, we may actually see, for the first time, what the competitor to the American F-22 looks like. Deputy Prime Minister Sergey Ivanov said on Wednesday that "We are not making any New Year presents, but flight tests will start in the very near future."
26-12-2009 - Moscow -- According to the official RIA Novosti agency, the aircraft trials would begin in 2010. Deputy Defense Minister Vladimir Popovkin has said the fighter, which has been under development since the 1990s, will enter service with the Air Force in 2015. Russia only has one fifth-generation project - Sukhoi's PAK FA and the current prototype is the T-50. It was designed to compete with the U.S. F-22 Raptor (so far the world's only fifth-generation fighter aircraft) and F-35 Lightning II, but has yet to take to the skies.

The T-50's maiden flight has been repeatedly postponed since early 2007 for unspecified reasons. However, in August 2009, Russian Air Force Chief Alexander Zelin said that there were problems with the engines and research was ongoing. The PAK FA is believed to possess advanced avionics, stealth capability, a ferry range of 4,000 to 5,500 km, and endurance of 3.3 hours. It is armed with next-generation air-to-air, air-to-surface, and air-to-ship missiles, and has two 30-mm cannons.

For more about the PAK-FA Sukhoi T-50 click here.



Source: realclearworld.com

COMMENTS:

As Sukhoi constraction berau members claimed, PAKFA will be superior to F-22 Raptor almost in every important aspect - better performance, better weapons and radar systems, better manoeuvrability. I hope it's true.

RuAF observer | posted on Jan 02, 2010 @ 19:24


One thing you're not taking into account RuAF observer. The United States currently has triangular shaped anti-gravity aircraft and other types of interceptors/attack and reconnaissance that are probably 60 years ahead of the current 5th generation aircraft. For example, we tested this aircraft against the Belgian F-16's around 1990. Type in TR3-B in a google search. Also, $50 billion dollars per year go into the secret projects-so there's no telling what types of aircraft we have now. Why this technology has not been implemented into the current US Air force fleet are unknown, however, this is probably something we would have as a back up if were invaded. The F-22A first flew around 1990 and is already 20 years behind in technology, so comparing the new Russian fighter jet to this jet isn't saying much.

Chris | posted on Jan 03, 2010 @ 09:53


...:)...Молитесь:)

СССР | posted on Jan 14, 2010 @ 21:50


nope

haely | posted on Jan 15, 2010 @ 18:48


We need to focus more on wat China is doing. Im not saying we should turn are backs on russia

Brandon | posted on Jan 26, 2010 @ 04:08


1. "has triangular shaped anti-gravity aircraft and other types of interceptors/attack and reconnaissance that are probably 60 years ahead of the current 5th generation aircraft" Sorry, sounds made up.
2. "The F-22A first flew around 1990 and is already 20 years behind in technology, so comparing the new Russian fighter jet to this jet isn't saying much" We started working on 5gen in the 70s (including stealth modes). yet, this statement of yours cannot convince anyone either. Sorry.
PS I do not try do undermine US technology. I am aware of all probs (published) F22 has and still believe it is a great machine yet what you are saying is unheard of


Chris | posted on Jan 03, 2010 @ 09:53



...:)...Молитесь:)


СССР | posted on Jan 14, 2010 @ 21:50



nope


haely | posted on Jan 15, 2010 @ 18:48



We need to focus more on wat China is doing. Im not saying we should turn are backs on russia


Brandon | posted on Jan 26, 2010 @ 04:08




Comment on this article: (all fields required)


Name:


Email: (stays invisible)


Comment:
"has triangular shaped anti-gravity aircraft and other types of interceptors/attack and reconnaissance that are probably 60 years ahead of the current 5th generation aircraft" Sorry, sounds made up.

2. The F-22A first flew around 1990 and is already 20 years behind in technology, so comparing the new Russian fighter jet to this jet isn't saying much.


Chris | posted on Jan 03, 2010 @ 09:53



...:)...Молитесь:)


СССР | posted on Jan 14, 2010 @ 21:50



nope


haely | posted on Jan 15, 2010 @ 18:48



We need to focus more on wat China is doing. Im not saying we should turn are backs on russia


Brandon | posted on Jan 26, 2010 @ 04:08




Comment on this article: (all fields required)


Name:


Email: (stays invisible)


Comment:
"has triangular shaped anti-gravity aircraft and other types of interceptors/attack and reconnaissance that are probably 60 years ahead of the current 5th generation aircraft" Sorry, sounds made up.













tania | posted on Feb 02, 2010 @ 05:37


Are you on planet earth? The US spends more on defense than the next 16 nations combined.(Probably around 850-900 billion dollars per year) For you to say that what I mentioned is made up means that you've never conducted any type of research. We've conducted stealth research since the 1970's doesn't mean much when the 2 billion dollar B-2 loses its stealth capability when it gets wet and recently Lockheed covered up the F-22's problems according to a lawsuit filed by a former employee of Lockheed. He mentioned that they commited fraud regarding the F-22’s stealth coatings. Specifically, from September 1995 until June 1999 when he left Lockheed, Olsen witnessed Lockheed order and use coatings that Lockheed knew were defective and the company knowingly applied faulty stealth coatings to the Raptor’s skin.
In regards to what I mentioned about the triangular aircraft. Belgian air force testimony and radar reports were released to the press back in 1990 in regards to the pilots getting into a dogfight with a triangular shaped aircraft that seemed to move with gravity not affecting it. $60 billion dollars are spent each year on secret weapons. Rumsfeld mentioned back in 2001 that the Pentagon could not account for spending 2 trillion dollars. Where are all of the trillions of dollars going?








Chris | posted on Feb 03, 2010 @ 00:56


Chris.

The US can spend as much as it wishes on it toys & its not something to be really proud of, you still need to know how to use it...Vietnam is a clue and a history lesson! Learn it!!!!

Stone | posted on Feb 07, 2010 @ 15:38


He who understands nothing? Knows nothing!!! Nothing but speculation and The Pak T-50 will never have a chance ever..
China is NEVER going to be a suepr power,It`s already imploding... U.S. is being run by Short SSIted Mental Midgets who have forgotten lesson of Pearl Harbor and of course$$$ in the WINNER in the Group of Prostitutes known as Congress and Russia too...In the end, it wont matter, we all lose...

Stormhelm | posted on Mar 01, 2010 @ 00:05


they have already started testing?

f-22 raptor fan | posted on Mar 15, 2010 @ 11:24


i do not think there will be any competitor for the f22 raptor soon. even Russia itself may not produce anything which can give competition to the F22 Raptor Jet.

kariuki | posted on Mar 17, 2010 @ 19:11


i do not think there will be any competitor for the f22 raptor soon. even Russia itself may not produce anything which can give competition to the F22 Raptor Jet.

kariuki | posted on Mar 17, 2010 @ 19:14


i do not think there will be any competitor for the f22 raptor soon. even Russia itself may not produce anything which can give competition to the F22 Raptor Jet.

kariuki | posted on Mar 17, 2010 @ 19:14


The F 22 is a piece of jewelry.

simon torbik | posted on Mar 20, 2010 @ 23:44


The F -22 was incredible. WAS INCREDIBLE.

Simon Torbik | posted on Apr 07, 2010 @ 22:51


The F -22 was incredible. WAS INCREDIBLE.

Simon Torbik | posted on Apr 07, 2010 @ 22:52


The F -22 was incredible. WAS INCREDIBLE.

Simon Torbik | posted on Apr 07, 2010 @ 22:52


The F-22 will be superior forever!!!!!! nuff said..

T Raptor Forever | posted on Apr 16, 2010 @ 19:53


To those who whine about the US spending so much on our defense. Well I wished we didn't have to that much on defense but it's a necessary expenditure. I would rather deal from a position of power. I can't understand how someone can make statements that the new Soviet plane is going to be superior to the F-22. We will have to wait until it shows up. Can't depend on press releases from Russia or anyone for that matter. Countries play mind games with each other. However I do commend Russia for making do with a lot less money. They can be creative.

Gordon | posted on May 25, 2010 @ 23:53


I don't know, Russia has come out with some really cool prototype aircraft, the Su-47 Berkut, Mig 1.44, but they never put them in to full producton. the T-50 is a very cool looking jet, and i hope it gets put in to producton, and not throw away like so meny other very cappable aircraft. as for my bit on T-50 vs F-22, your all forgeting one thing, the pilot. when 2 planes are as closely mached as they are, it really all depends on whos holding the stick. oh, and personaly, I like the YF-23 better than both

Alex | posted on May 29, 2010 @ 09:39


The F-22 is far superior to the T-50. I have serious doubts as to whether or not the T-50 is actually a 5th gen fighter. Many times in history the Soviets and now Russia have "Faked" machines to try to show the world they could compete technologically with the US. But none were ever put into production. The T-50 engines are substandard and the avionics are suspect. But even if all of the claims about the the T-50 are true, Russia cannot afford to build more than a few of them, so it doesn't matter. Hell even the US can only afford a couple hundred F-22s. But the production estimates of the F-35 is 3,000 worldwide, so the T-50 is simply irrelevant.

Greg | posted on May 31, 2010 @ 20:32


As far as anti-gravity machines etc. That is really just stupid. I have no doubts that the US is already working on a replacement for the F-22. It takes 20 years to develop planes like the F-22. The T-50 is not a 5th gen plane. It is a shell produced to fool everyone into thinking that the Russians can compete. Russia is not a superpower in any sense of the word. Their land forces are poorly trained and ill equipped. Their navel forces are a disaster. The Air-force has decent planes and excellent pilots, but not enough of them and the maintenance is poor. The T-50, even if real, is to little to late.

The next break through will be a hypersonic plane. The US is well into the development process, but it will take another 20 years to perfect.

Russia does not have the technical skills or the resources to build such advanced fighters.

seapath | posted on May 31, 2010 @ 20:42


The American government said a few months ago that it was calcelling the F22 because it was too expensive and there wear no enemies that it was required fo combat.

Why this current argument ? The F22 is history.

Elderlybloke | posted on Jun 22, 2010 @ 07:48


Well its too early to judge. What we've anticipated might be right or wrong about this aircraft. No matter How many F-22s or T-50s might be produce by Russia, in a real war between US against Russia it would be a great destruction! Its the number of nukes this two nation posses that matters.

Wegn | posted on Jul 01, 2010 @ 17:44


post some new articles

john | posted on Jul 20, 2010 @ 21:16


The F-22 can always be brought into production with a new president (which it will be). Happened when Reagan brought production of the B1-B back online.

The Russian military can't even successfully make a prototype advance ballistic missile, so there's no way the T-50 will be even close to the F-22. Russian technology is decades behind the US.

F-22 vs. T-50 = T-50 EPIC FAIL.

Stephen | posted on Jul 27, 2010 @ 08:29


Este jogo e dimais

Valtercides | posted on Aug 21, 2010 @ 21:39


Comment on this article: (all fields required)

Name:

Email: (stays invisible)

Comment:
 
 

   cool  Learn more about the F119-PW-100 thrustvectoring jet engines that power the Raptor  
   tech  F-22A AN/APG-77 radar can target multiple threaths. Find out how.  
  3D F-22A simulation  
  How to make a plane disappear from radar  
  USAF F-22A pilot recruitment trailer
:: 900 kB wmv format

 



Can the JSF fill the gap of non-produced F-22's?
yes
no
     Results













:: SiteLab Internet Engineering - the Netherlands
©1999-2010 SiteLab Internet Engineering. All rights reserved.